Baldemar Hinojoza v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 144th Judicial District Court of Bexar County

State: Texas

Docket No: 04-07-00148-CR

Case Date: 11/14/2007

Plaintiff: THE STATE OF TEXAS

Defendant: CORY CASTLEBERRY (Original)

Preview:Baldemar Hinojoza v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 144th Judicial District Court of Bexar County
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-07-00148-CR Baldemar HINOJOZA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2005-CR-0080 Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 14, 2007

AFFIRMED Baldemar Hinojoza pled true to violating conditions of his community supervision in response to the State's motion to revoke community supervision. Hinojoza appeals from the revocation of his community supervision. Hinojoza's courtappointed appellate attorney filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which she concludes that the appeal is without merit. A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to Hinojoza, who was advised of his right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Hinojoza did not file a pro se brief. We have reviewed the record and counsel's Anders brief. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice DO NOT PUBLISH

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/20664.html[8/20/2013 8:03:30 PM]

Download 20664.pdf