Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 10th District Court of Appeals » 2001 » Barbara Kay Blake Beard v. Bramlet Frank Beard--Appeal from 74th District Court of McLennan County
Barbara Kay Blake Beard v. Bramlet Frank Beard--Appeal from 74th District Court of McLennan County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 10-98-00357-CV
Case Date: 06/27/2001
Plaintiff: Barbara Kay Blake Beard
Defendant: Bramlet Frank Beard--Appeal from 74th District Court of McLennan County
Preview:Barbara Kay Blake Beard v. Bramlet Frank Beard-Appeal from 74th District Court of McLennan County
/**/ IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-98-357-CV

BARBARA KAY BLAKE BEARD, Appellant v.

BRAMLET FRANK BEARD, Appellee

From the 74th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court # 97-1973-3 OPINION DENYING REHEARING

One of the grounds raised in Barbara Beard s motion for rehearing concerns our treatment of her sixteenth issue. In this issue, Barbara challenged the court s appointment of a receiver to sell the marital residence. We overruled this issue as moot because, in our words, after Barbara perfected this appeal, the holder of the purchase money note on the residence declared a default on the note and foreclosed on the property under the terms of the deed of trust. Barbara does not disagree with our conclusion that this issue was rendered moot by the sale of the residence at foreclosure. However, she advises that another lawsuit is currently pending regarding the propriety of the foreclosure proceedings. According to Barbara, this other litigation directly implicates the issues of who was the lawful holder of the note and whether the foreclosure was conducted in accordance with the terms of the deed of trust. We understand her concern to be that our language could be construed as an adjudication of the issues raised in the litigation concerning the propriety of the foreclosure proceedings. Accordingly, we note that the above-quoted language from our opinion shall not be construed as an adjudication of the propriety of the foreclosure proceedings. With this clarification, we deny the motion for rehearing.

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/4345.html[8/20/2013 7:15:06 PM]

REX D. DAVIS Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Davis Justice Vance and Justice Gray Rehearing denied Opinion delivered and filed June 27, 2001 Publish

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/4345.html[8/20/2013 7:15:06 PM]

Download 4345.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips