Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 3rd District Court of Appeals » 2007 » Carl M. Patton v. Employees Retirement System of Texas--Appeal from 53rd District Court of Travis County
Carl M. Patton v. Employees Retirement System of Texas--Appeal from 53rd District Court of Travis County
State: Texas
Court: Criminal Court of Appeals
Docket No: 03-07-00170-CV
Case Date: 12/19/2007
Plaintiff: H & H SAND AND GRAVEL, INC.
Defendant: CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI--Appeal from 148th District Court of Nueces County
Preview:EX PARTE CHARLES EDWARD MADDEN (Original)
Texas Judiciary Online - HTML Opinion     Close This Window
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
NO. AP-75,823 EX PARTE CHARLES EDWARD MADDEN, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 23715A-86 IN THE 86TH DISTRICT COURT FROM KAUFMAN COUNTY Per curiam.
O P I N I O N
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine and sentenced to sixty years' imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Madden v. State, 05-05-01626-CR (Tex.
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs/16413.html[8/20/2013 6:37:30 PM]
App.--Dallas Oct. 18, 2006 no pet.).
Applicant contends that he did not receive notice that his conviction had been affirmed and was not advised of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se.
Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that counsel timely sent a letter to Applicant notifying him that his conviction had been affirmed and of his right to petition for discretionary appeal pro se but that Applicant did not receive that notice. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fifth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 05-05-01626-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case No. 23715A-86 from the 86th Judicial District Court of Kaufman County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with the Fifth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court's mandate issues.
Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).
Delivered: January 23, 2008
Do not publish
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs/16413.html[8/20/2013 6:37:30 PM]


Download 16413.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips