Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 7th District Court of Appeals » 2009 » Earnest Lee Marshall v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 242nd District Court of Hale County
Earnest Lee Marshall v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 242nd District Court of Hale County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 07-08-00499-CR
Case Date: 12/07/2009
Plaintiff: Earnest Lee Marshall
Defendant: The State of Texas--Appeal from 242nd District Court of Hale County
Preview:Basem Mishal, Individually and d/b/a Safe Motors and World Motors v. Tom Vela, Individually, and Debi Farmer, and Associated Carriages, Inc.--Appeal from 166th Judicial District Court of Bexar County
No. 04-00-00795-CV Basem MISHAL, et al., Appellants v. Tom VELA, et al., Appellees From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2000-CI-12164 Honorable Pat Boone, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Alma L. L pez, Justice Catherine Stone, Justice Paul W. Green, Justice Delivered and Filed: February 28, 2001 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION The clerk's record in the above numbered and styled appeal was due to be filed in this court by December 19, 2000. When the clerk's record was not filed, we sent a letter to the clerk asking why the record had not been filed. In response, the clerk filed a notice of late record stating that the appellant was not entitled to appeal without paying the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record, and that the appellant had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee. We then ordered the appellant to provide written proof, by February 9, 2001, that either (1) the clerk's fee had been paid or arrangements had been made to pay the clerk's fee; or (2) the appellant was entitled to appeal without paying the clerk's fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). We instructed that if the appellant failed to respond by February 9, 2001, this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). The appellant did not respond. As a result, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See id. R. 42.3. The costs of the appeal are taxed against the appellant. PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/13652.html[8/20/2013 7:27:16 PM]

Download 13652.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips