Edlee Taylor v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 2nd District Court of Cherokee County

State: Texas

Court: Texas Northern District Court

Docket No: 12-05-00172-CR

Case Date: 10/12/2005

Plaintiff: John Douglas Simmons

Defendant: Alan Thompson et al--Appeal from 385th District Court of Midland County

Preview:John Douglas Simmons v. Alan Thompson et al--Appeal
from 385th District Court of Midland County
/**/
11th Court of Appeals
Eastland, Texas
Memorandum Opinion
John Douglas Simmons
Appellant
Vs. No. 11-03-00353-CV Appeal from Midland County
Alan Thompson et al
Appellees
John Douglas Simmons filed a notice of appeal on October 21, 2003, and paid the required filing fee. When the clerk s
record was not filed by the original due date, this court extended the time for filing. The clerk of the trial court has
informed this court in writing that Simmons has neither requested nor paid for the clerk s record.
On November 10, 2003, the clerk of this court wrote appellant notifying him that, unless he requested and paid for the
clerk s record within 15 days and unless he furnished proof of payment to this court within 15 days, the appeal would
be dismissed. The only response to the November 10 letter has been appellees motion to dismiss, filed in this court on
November 19, 2003.
In their motion, appellees contend that appellant s notice of appeal was not timely filed because appellant filed his
motion for new trial in the wrong cause number or because, if the motion for new trial extended the time in the present
cause number, appellant filed his notice of appeal 105 days after the date the judgment was signed. Appellees further
contend that, if the motion for new trial did extend the appellate timetable, appellant has neither filed a motion for
extension of time nor provided a reasonable explanation so that this court may apply the holding in Verburgt v.
Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615 (Tex.1997), and find that appellant has timely perfected his appeal. Appellant has not
responded to this court s request that he file a response to the motion to dismiss.
The appellees motion to dismiss is granted. Appellant s notice of appeal is not timely, and appellant has failed to file
either a timely motion for extension of time or a reasonable explanation for his failure to timely file his notice of
appeal. TEX.R.APP.P. 26.1 & 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner, supra. Moreover, the failure to file the clerk s record is due to
appellant s actions. TEX.R.APP.P. 37.3(b).
The appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
December 11, 2003
Not designated for publication. See TEX.R.APP.P. 47.2(a).
Panel consists of: Arnot, C.J., and Wright, J.
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/7368.html[8/20/2013 7:23:04 PM]

McCall, J., not participating.
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/7368.html[8/20/2013 7:23:04 PM]

Download 7368.pdf