Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 1st District Court of Appeals » 2004 » Esteban Aguinaga v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 174th District Court of Harris County
Esteban Aguinaga v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 174th District Court of Harris County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 01-03-00372-CR
Case Date: 06/03/2004
Plaintiff: Esteban Aguinaga
Defendant: The State of Texas--Appeal from 174th District Court of Harris County
Preview:Esteban Aguinaga v. The State of Texas--Appeal from
174th District Court of Harris County
Opinion issued June 3, 2004
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
NOS. 01-03-00371-CR
01-03-00372-CR
ESTEBAN AGUINAGA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 174th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 924324 and 924323
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Esteban Aguinaga, pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery and aggravated sexual assault. After preparation of
a presentence investigation report, the trial court assessed punishment at 35 years in each case to run concurrently. We
affirm.
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/80537.html[8/20/2013 8:20:47 PM]




Appellant s court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the appeals are without merit. The brief meets the
requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967), by presenting a professional
evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds of error to be advanced. See High v.
State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Moore v. State, 845 S.W.2d 352, 353 (Tex. App. Houston [1st
Dist.] 1992, pet. ref d).
The brief states that a copy was delivered to appellant, whom counsel advised of his right to examine the appellate
record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). More than 30 days
have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel s brief. We
find no reversible error in the record, and agree that the appeals are without merit.
We affirm the judgments of the trial court. //
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Jennings, and Keyes.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/80537.html[8/20/2013 8:20:47 PM]





Download 80537.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips