EX PARTE MARCOS EUGENIO GARCIA (Other)

State: Texas

Docket No: AP-75,995

Case Date: 09/10/2008

Plaintiff: Wilson M. Shepard and Daniel L. Shepard

Defendant: Prescription Dispensing Laboratories, Inc.--Appeal from 166th Judicial District Court of Bexar Coun

Preview:Wilson M. Shepard and Daniel L. Shepard v.
Prescription Dispensing Laboratories, Inc.--Appeal
from 166th Judicial District Court of Bexar County
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-03-00941-CV
Wilson M. SHEPARD and Daniel L. Shepard,
Appellants
v.
PRESCRIPTION DISPENSING LABORATORIES, INC.,
Appellee
From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2002-CI-05928
Honorable Rebecca Simmons, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Alma L. L pez, Chief Justice
Catherine Stone, Justice
Paul W. Green, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 28, 2004
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
The trial court clerk filed a notification of late record stating that the clerk's record had not been filed because
appellants' attorney told the clerk that the appellants may be unable to pay the fee for preparing the record. On June 24,
2004, we ordered appellants to provide written proof to this court that either (1) the clerk's fee had been paid or
arrangements had been made to pay the clerk's fee; or (2) appellants are entitled to appeal without paying the clerk's
fee. We informed appellants that if they failed to respond within the time provided, the appeal would be dismissed for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellants failed to respond to our order. Accordingly, this appeal is
dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
PER CURIAM
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/17340.html[8/20/2013 7:44:22 PM]

Download 17340.pdf