Gilbert McNeil v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company--Appeal from 96th District Court of Tarrant County (Per Curiam)

State: Texas

Court: Texas Northern District Court

Docket No: 02-11-00409-CV

Case Date: 02/23/2012

Plaintiff: Gilbert McNeil

Defendant: Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company--Appeal from 96th District Court of Tarrant County

Preview:COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00405-CV WILLIE LAVAN V. BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND NO. 02-11-00407-CV LEROY ROSS V. BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND NO. 02-11-00408-CV FLOYD TOWNSEND V. BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND APPELLEE APPELLANT APPELLEE APPELLANT APPELLEE APPELLANT

NO. 02-11-00409-CV GILBERT MCNEIL V. BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND NO. 02-11-00410-CV CHARLES KING V. BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND NO. 02-11-00411-CV THOMAS JACKSON V. BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND NO. 02-11-00412-CV TED FLEMINGS APPELLANT APPELLEE APPELLANT APPELLEE APPELLANT APPELLEE APPELLANT

2

V. BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND NO. 02-11-00414-CV CHARLES BOOKER V. BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY -----------FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY -----------APPELLEE APPELLANT APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT
-----------On the court=s own motion, the above causes are hereby consolidated in this court. Each cause shall continue to bear its respective case number. On January 13, 2012, we notified appellants that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in the above appeals informed the court that payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk's record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P.
1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 3

35.3(a)(2).

We stated that we would dismiss these appeals for want of

prosecution unless appellants made arrangements to pay for the clerk's record and provided this court with proof of payment. Because appellants have not made payment arrangements for the clerk's record, it is the opinion of the court that these appeals should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). Appellants shall pay all costs of the appeals, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. DELIVERED: February 23, 2012

4

Download 02-11-00409-cv.pdf