Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 6th District Court of Appeals » 2013 » GTE Southwest Incorporated, d/b/a Verizon Southwest v. Warner Durrell Seale and Helen Elizabeth SealeAppeal from 336th District Court of Fannin County (Memorandum Opinion By Chief Justice Iii Morriss)
GTE Southwest Incorporated, d/b/a Verizon Southwest v. Warner Durrell Seale and Helen Elizabeth SealeAppeal from 336th District Court of Fannin County (Memorandum Opinion By Chief Justice Iii Morriss)
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 06-13-00016-CV
Case Date: 05/30/2013
Plaintiff: GTE Southwest Incorporated, d/b/a Verizon Southwest
Defendant: Warner Durrell Seale and Helen Elizabeth SealeAppeal from 336th District Court of Fannin County (Me
Preview:In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00016-CV

GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED, D/B/A VERIZON SOUTHWEST, Appellant V. WARNER DURRELL SEALE AND HELEN ELIZABETH SEALE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 336th Judicial District Court Fannin County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-09-39419

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

MEMORANDUM OPINION
On March 1, 2013, GTE Southwest Incorporated, d/b/a Verizon Southwest (Verizon Southwest), appellant, filed its notice of appeal in this matter and another case bearing our cause number 06-13-00015-CV. While Verizon Southwest timely filed its docketing statement and paid the mandated filing fees in cause number 06-13-00015-CV, it has not done so in this case. On April 19, 2013, we notified Verizon Southwest of these defects and provided it an opportunity to cure them. Additionally, we warned that failure to adequately respond within ten days of the date of the letter would subject this appeal to dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). We have received no response from Verizon Southwest with respect to this cause since that time. Pursuant to Rule 42.3(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. 1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).

Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice Date Submitted: Date Decided: May 29, 2013 May 30, 2013

1

This dismissal does not affect our case numbered 06-13-00015-CV.

2

Download 06-13-00016-cv.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips