Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 6th District Court of Appeals » 2002 » Gwen L. Conkleton v. Judge James M. Carlow, et al--Appeal from 102nd District Court of Bowie County
Gwen L. Conkleton v. Judge James M. Carlow, et al--Appeal from 102nd District Court of Bowie County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 06-02-00053-CV
Case Date: 10/31/2002
Plaintiff: Jimmy Dean Hodges
Defendant: The State of Texas--Appeal from 114th District Court of Smith County
Preview:Daniel Clark v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 40th District Court of Ellis County
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-03-00268-CR DANIEL CLARK, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

From the 40th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court # 26874CR MEMORANDUM Opinion A jury convicted Appellant Daniel Clark of murder, and the trial court sentenced him to life in prison. After being fully admonished, Clark represented himself in the trial court, and he continues his pro se representation in this appeal. Clark s brief was originally due on October 13, 2003, and he was granted an extension until December 10, 2003. When Clark s brief was not filed, we abated this appeal for a hearing in the trial court for a determination of why Clark had failed to file his brief and whether prison officials were denying Clark reasonable access to the appellate record. After the trial court hearing, we entered an order on September 15, 2004 giving Clark sixty days to file his brief and notifying him that if he failed to timely file his brief, we would decide his appeal without briefs, reviewing the record only for fundamental error. Clark has not filed his brief. We and the trial court have made every effort to protect Clark s rights. See Carroll v. State, 75 S.W.3d 633, 634 (Tex. App. Waco 2002, no pet.). We will thus submit this appeal without briefs and review the record for fundamental error. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(4); Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687, 687-88 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994 ); Carroll, 75 S.W.3d at 634. Our review of the record discloses no unassigned fundamental error. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court s judgment. BILL VANCE Justice

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/6386.html[8/20/2013 7:20:47 PM]

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Vance, and Justice Reyna Affirmed Opinion delivered and filed April 20, 2005 Do Not Publish [CRPM]

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/6386.html[8/20/2013 7:20:47 PM]

Download 6386.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips