Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 6th District Court of Appeals » 2002 » Hemir Frutiz v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 209th District Court of Harris County
Hemir Frutiz v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 209th District Court of Harris County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 06-02-00177-CR
Case Date: 12/03/2002
Plaintiff: David Wilkerson
Defendant: The State of Texas--Appeal from 54th District Court of McLennan County
Preview:David Wilkerson v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 54th District Court of McLennan County
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-03-00396-CR David Wilkerson, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court # 2000-632-C MEMORANDUM Opinion David Wilkerson was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision for five years for the offense of indecency with a child. In 2003, the trial court adjudicated Wilkerson s guilt and sentenced him to ten years confinement. Wilkerson appeals. Wilkerson s counsel filed an Anders brief contending that this appeal presents no issues of arguable merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Wilkerson has not filed a pro se brief or other response, though he was notified of his right to do so. See Sowels v. State, 45 S.W.3d 690, 691 (Tex. App. Waco 2001, no pet.). Because our independent review of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, we will affirm. A deferred adjudication case is not appealable if the trial court subsequently determines, after a hearing, to adjudicate guilt because of a violation of the terms of community supervision. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42.12, 5(b) (Vernon Supp. 2004-2005); Connolly v. State, 983 S.W.2d 723, 741 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). The punishment assessed by the trial court is within the statutory range. Tex. Pen. Code Ann. 21.11 (Vernon 2003); Tex. Pen. Code Ann. 12.33(a) (Vernon 2003). Out independent review of the record has revealed no issues of arguable merit. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. Because the trial court has already granted counsel s motion to withdraw, Wilkerson is hereby notified that he has a right to file a petition for discretionary review with the Court of Criminal Appeals.[1] See Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25, 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); see also Sowels, 45 S.W.3d at 694. FELIPE REYNA

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/6418.html[8/20/2013 7:20:54 PM]

Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Vance, and Justice Reyna Affirmed Opinion delivered and filed May 4, 2005 Do not publish [CR25]

[1] The petition must be filed with the clerk of this court within thirty days. Tex. R. App. P. 68.3.

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/6418.html[8/20/2013 7:20:54 PM]

Download 6418.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips