Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 3rd District Court of Appeals » 1997 » Hermalando Ulloa Lopez v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 33rd District Court of Burnet County
Hermalando Ulloa Lopez v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 33rd District Court of Burnet County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 03-95-00651-CR
Case Date: 02/27/1997
Plaintiff: Daniel Lee Grant
Defendant: Robert C. Morris, et al.--Appeal from 52nd District Court of Coryell County
Preview:Daniel Lee Grant v. Robert C. Morris, et al.--Appeal from 52nd District Court of Coryell County
Grant-DL v. State /**/ IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-94-199-CV

DANIEL LEE GRANT, Appellant v.

ROBERT C. MORRIS, ET AL., Appellee

From the 52nd District Court Coryell County, Texas Trial Court # 26,088

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Daniel Grant appealed from an instructed verdict in favor of Robert Morris, et al., rendered at the close of his case in chief. Grant filed his notice of appeal and affidavit of inability to pay costs on June 6, 1994, and the transcript was filed in this court on June 21. Although his brief was due on July 19, no appellant's brief has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 74(k). Appellate Rule 74(l)(1) provides: Civil Cases. In civil cases, when the appellant has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless reasonable explanation is shown for such failure and that appellee has not suffered material injury thereby. The court may, however, decline to dismiss the appeal, whereupon it shall give such direction to the cause as it may deem proper. Id. 74(l)(1).

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/1386.html[8/20/2013 7:04:29 PM]

More than thirty days have passed since Grant's brief was due. We notified Grant of this defect by letter on November 2. See id. 60(a)(2), 83. He has not responded to our letter showing grounds for continuing the appeal nor has he provided a reasonable explanation for failing to file a brief. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosection. See id. 74(l)(1). PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Thomas, Justice Cummings, and Justice Vance Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed November 16, 1994 Do not publish

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/1386.html[8/20/2013 7:04:29 PM]

Download 1386.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips