Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » Supreme Court » 2008 » IN RE JACK JORDEN, M.D., ET AL. (Majority)
IN RE JACK JORDEN, M.D., ET AL. (Majority)
State: Texas
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: 06-0369
Case Date: 03/28/2008
Judge: Harriet O Neill
Preview:IN RE JACK JORDEN, M.D., ET AL. (Majority)
MAJORITY | CONCURRING IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ============ No. 06-0369 ============ In Re Jack Jorden, M.D. et al., Relators ==================================================== On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ==================================================== Argued September 26, 2007 Justice O Neill, concurring. The Court concludes that, until an expert report is filed, discovery concerning a potential health care liability claim against a provider is limited to that prescribed in section 74.351(s) of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code, which does not include Rule 202 presuit depositions. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code 74.351(s). I agree, and fully join the Court s opinion. I write separately, though, to emphasize that while the Legislature s purpose in enacting Chapter 74 was to decrease costs associated with meritless claims, it sought to do so in a manner that will not unduly restrict a claimant s rights any more than necessary to deal with the crisis. Act of June 1, 2003, 78th Leg., R.S., ch. 204, 10.11(b)(3), 2003 Tex. Gen. Law 847, 884. Accordingly, if the discovery methods that section 74.351(s) allows are fully and effectively utilized but fail to yield information necessary to assess the merits of the potential claim, e.g., the medical records are lost or indecipherable and responses to written questions are unenlightening or evasive, I would leave some discretion in the trial court to allow discovery under Rule 202 if a failure . . . of justice in [the] anticipated suit would otherwise result. Tex. R. Civ. P. 202. Because, in this case, the potential claimant has not availed himself of the discovery tools that the rules concerning health care liability claims allow, I agree with the Court that the presuit depositions he seeks are prohibited. ___________________________________ Harriet O Neill Justice OPINION DELIVERED: March 28, 2008

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/2001150.html[8/20/2013 9:04:13 PM]

Download 2001150.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips