Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 3rd District Court of Appeals » 2010 » In re K.B.--Appeal from 395th District Court of Williamson County
In re K.B.--Appeal from 395th District Court of Williamson County
State: Texas
Court: Criminal Court of Appeals
Docket No: 03-09-00366-CV
Case Date: 12/09/2010
Plaintiff: Jerry Bridges
Defendant: The State of Texas--Appeal from 16th District Court of Denton County
Preview:Mario S. Villanueva v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 290th Judicial District Court of Bexar County
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-06-00006-CR Mario S. VILLANUEVA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2005-CR-1269B Honorable Sharon MacRae, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Alma L. L pez, Chief Justice Sitting: Alma L. L pez, Chief Justice Catherine Stone, Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Delivered and Filed: December 13, 2006 AFFIRMED The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion for continuance. Having announced ready at a docket call, defense counsel filed a motion for continuance on the day of trial because his investigator had been unable to locate and interview two potential witnesses in the four days between the announcement and the date of trial. Apart from stating that the witnesses were present at the scene of the crime, which occurred one year before trial, and that the witnesses gave statements to the police, the motion for continuance does not provide any details with regard to the substance of the witnesses' testimony. Accepting that the motion was sufficient to preserve error, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion which failed to even generally aver the nature of the witnesses' expected testimony. Harrison v. State, 187 S.W.3d 429, 433 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (discussing preservation of error but finding no abuse of discretion where motion failed to list specific and material facts to which missing witness was expected to testify). The trial court's judgment is affirmed. Alma L. L pez, Chief Justice Do Not Publish

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/19784.html[8/20/2013 8:01:32 PM]

Download 19784.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips