Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 7th District Court of Appeals » 2007 » In Re Steven D. Evans, Relator--Appeal from of County
In Re Steven D. Evans, Relator--Appeal from of County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 07-07-00444-CV
Case Date: 11/01/2007
Plaintiff: DUSTIN REID JEFFERS
Defendant: THE STATE OF TEXAS--Appeal from 105th District Court of Kleberg County
Preview:NO. 07-07-0444-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C NOVEMBER 1, 2007 ______________________________

In re STEVEN D. EVANS, Relator

_________________________________ On Original Proceeding for Writ of Mandamus _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Pending before this court is the application of Steven D. Evans for a writ of mandamus. Through it, he requests that we direct Judge John B. Board of the 181st District Court of Potter County to act upon his request for DNA testing. The motion was allegedly filed in March of 2007. We deny the application for the reasons which follow. Rules of procedure obligate one seeking mandamus relief to accompany his petition with an appendix. TEX . R. APP. P. 52.3(j). The latter must include, among other things, a certified or sworn copy of the document showing the matter complained of. In this case, the document showing the matter complained of would be the motion for DNA testing. However, it was not provided to the court. Nor did he verify by affidavit the factual

allegations in his petition. Such was and is also required by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. TEX . R. APP. P. 52.3. Similarly, the format of his application for writ does not comport with other requirements of appellate rule 52. For instance, the application contains no identity of the parties and counsel, table of contents, index of authorities, statement of the case, or statement of the issues presented. Rule 52.3 requires one seeking extraordinary relief, such as a writ of mandamus, to include those matters in his petition. And, that Evans may be acting pro se does not relieve him of complying with the rules of procedure. Holt v. F.F. Enters., 990 S.W.2d 756, 759 (Tex. App.
Download 12228.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips