In The Interest Of S.D. & K.D., Children--Appeal from 198th Judicial District Court of Kerr County

State: Texas

Court: Texas Northern District Court

Docket No: 04-97-00412-CV

Case Date: 08/31/1998

Plaintiff: Aderian Jerrel McBride

Defendant: The State of Texas--Appeal from 400th District Court of Fort Bend County

Preview:In The Interest Of S.D. & K.D., Children--Appeal from
198th Judicial District Court of Kerr County
MAJORITY | MAJORITY
DISSENTING OPINION
No. 04-97-00412-CV
In the Interest of S.D. and K.D.
From the 198th Judicial District, Kerr County, Texas
Trial Court No. 96-396-B
Honorable E. Karl Prohl, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Catherine Stone, Justice
Dissenting opinion by: Alma L. L pez, Justice
Sitting: Alma L. L pez, Justice
Catherine Stone, Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 31, 1998
Although I agree with the majority that there is sufficient evidence to support the termination of parental rights, I
disagree that venue is proper in Kerr County and, therefore, I respectfully dissent.
The majority finds that the parents of the subject children waived venue in Bexar County. In a matter as important as
whether parental rights are to be terminated, it is absolutely essential that parents be fully and completely informed of
their legal rights. In this case, the parents of the children were not notified that the question of venue would be
addressed at the hearing on the Department's emergency order until the attorney for the Department made an oral
motion to change venue. Further, the parents were unrepresented and were given an explanation of what was about to
transpire as to venue by the Department's attorney in a few sentences during the hearing. After the explanation of
whether the parties would agree that the case be transferred to Kerr County, the trial judge stated that because the Kerr
County District Court was the court of continuing jurisdiction, venue would be transferred there. The basis for the
judge's statement as to continuing jurisdiction was that there had been a previous termination case as to the parents'
oldest child in Kerr County. However, that case had been fully adjudicated and had no connection to the case before
the court in Bexar County.
Because the parents did not receive prior notice of the Department's intention to request a change of venue, and
because there was no court of continuing jurisdiction, the change of venue to Kerr County was improper. I would
reverse and remand this case to the trial court for a proper determination of venue.
Alma L. L pez, Justice
PUBLISH
Return to
4th Court of Appeals Opinions
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/15289.html[8/20/2013 7:36:33 PM]

Download 15289.pdf