In the Matter of B. R.--Appeal from 98th District Court of Travis County

State: Texas

Court: Texas Northern District Court

Docket No: 03-97-00283-CV

Case Date: 12/11/1997

Preview:In the Matter of B. R.--Appeal from 98th District Court
of Travis County
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-97-00283-CV
In the Matter of B. R.
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. J-14,934, HONORABLE W. JEANNE MEURER, JUDGE PRESIDING
PER CURIAM
On May 27, 1997, the Clerk's office marked "Received," but did not file the transcript in this appeal. The transcript
was not filed because it did not show that the appeal was properly perfected. The appellant, a juvenile, had sought to
perfect its appeal by filing a notice of appeal. Under the rules of appellate procedure then in effect, the juvenile must
have perfected by filing a cost bond or substitute. See, e.g., former Tex. R. App. P. 40(a)(1); Brennan v. Court of
Appeals, Fourteenth Dist., 444 S.W.2d 290, 292 (Tex. 1968); In the Matter of T.D.S., 810 S.W.2d 906, 907 (Tex.
App.--San Antonio 1991, writ denied).
The Clerk wrote appellant on June 4, 1997, and again on September 25, 1997, offering appellant the opportunity to
amend by filing an appropriate perfecting instrument. See Linwood v. NCNB Tex., 885 S.W.2d 102 (Tex. 1994).
Appellant was advised that the Court had no jurisdiction in the absence of a proper perfecting instrument. Davies v.
Massey, 561 S.W.2d 799, 801 (Tex. 1978). Appellant was also cautioned that the Court could dismiss on its own
motion if it did not amend the notice of appeal. See former Tex. R. App. P. 54(c); 60(a)(2). Appellant has not
responded to either letter. The appeal is dismissed.
Before Justices Powers, Aboussie and B. A. Smith
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: December 11, 1997
Do Not Publish
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/2897.html[8/20/2013 7:12:54 PM]

Download 2897.pdf