Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 8th District Court of Appeals » 2004 » In the Matter of V.H., a Juvenile--Appeal from 65th District Court of El Paso County
In the Matter of V.H., a Juvenile--Appeal from 65th District Court of El Paso County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 08-03-00192-CV
Case Date: 08/05/2004
Preview:In the Matter of V.H., a Juvenile--Appeal from 65th
District Court of El Paso County
Becker v. State /**/
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
)
) No. 08-03-00192-CV
)
)Appeal from
IN THE MATTER OF: )
) 65th District Court
V.H., a Juvenile )
) of El Paso County, Texas
)
) (TC# 99,01122)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
V.H., a juvenile, appeals from the juvenile court s disposition order placing him on probation and sending him to the
Challenge Program. We affirm.
Appellant s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which she has concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous
and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d
493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by advancing contentions which counsel says
might arguably support the appeal. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516
S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436
S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). The procedures established in Anders apply to juvenile appeals. In re D.A.S., 973
S.W.2d 296, 297 (Tex. 1998).
A copy of counsel s brief has been delivered to V.H., and he has been advised of his right to examine the appellate
record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/62998.html[8/20/2013 8:10:13 PM]




We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel s brief, and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without
merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. A further discussion of the
arguable ground advanced in counsel s brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. The judgment is
affirmed.
August 5, 2004
ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice
Before Panel No. 2
Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/62998.html[8/20/2013 8:10:13 PM]





Download 62998.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips