Jack, Johnathan Derrick v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 339th District Court of Harris County

State: Texas

Court: Texas Northern District Court

Docket No: 01-00-00953-CR

Case Date: 12/02/2004

Plaintiff: Ray Gerami aka Abdolreza Geramifer, Individually, and Texas Gasahol, Inc.,

Defendant: American Express Travel Related Services Inc.--Appeal from Co Civil Ct at Law No 4 of Harris County

Preview:Jack, Johnathan Derrick v. The State of Texas--Appeal
from 339th District Court of Harris County
Opinion issued December 2, 2004
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
NO. 01-00-00953-CR
JOHNATHAN DERRICK JACK, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 339th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 838956
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury convicted appellant, Johnathan Derrick Jack, of delivery of less one gram of cocaine. Appellant pleaded true to
the allegations in two enhancement paragraphs that he had prior felony convictions. The jury assessed punishment at
confinement for 10 years and a fine of $2000. We affirm.
Appellant s court-appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief concluding that this appeal is
without merit. Counsel s brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/81186.html[8/20/2013 8:21:57 PM]

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record that demonstrates the lack of arguable grounds of error.
See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Moore v. State, 845 S.W.2d 352, 353 (Tex. App.
Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref d).
Counsel represents that she served a copy of the brief on appellant. Counsel also advised appellant of his right to
examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App.
1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. We have carefully reviewed the
record and counsel s brief. We find no reversible error in the record, and agree that the appeal is without merit.
We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.
We grant counsel s motion to withdraw. // See Stephens v. State, 35 S.W.3d 770, 771 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.]
2000, no pet.).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Taft, Jennings, and Bland.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/81186.html[8/20/2013 8:21:57 PM]

Download 81186.pdf