John Adam Toliver v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 179th District Court of Harris County

State: Texas

Court: Texas Northern District Court

Docket No: 14-04-00148-CR

Case Date: 12/02/2004

Plaintiff: John Adam Toliver

Defendant: The State of Texas--Appeal from 179th District Court of Harris County

Preview:Reynaldo Brena v. The State of Texas--Appeal from
338th District Court of Harris County
Opinion issued April 1, 2004
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
NO. 01-03-00872-CR
REYNALDO BRENA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 338th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 946472
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Reynaldo Brena pleaded guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery without a plea bargain agreement. After
preparation of a presentence investigation report, the trial court sentenced him to confinement for seven years. We
affirm.
Appellant s court-appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief concluding that this appeal is
without merit. Counsel s brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/80318.html[8/20/2013 8:20:21 PM]

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record that demonstrates the lack of arguable grounds of error.
See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Moore v. State, 845 S.W.2d 352, 353 (Tex. App.
Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref d).
Counsel represents that he served a copy of the brief on appellant. Counsel also advised appellant of his right to
examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App.
1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. We have carefully reviewed the
record and counsel s brief. We find no reversible error in the record, and agree that the appeal is without merit.
We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.
We grant counsel s motion to withdraw. // See Stephens v. State, 35 S.W.3d 770, 771 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.]
2000, no pet.).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Taft, Hanks, and Higley.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/80318.html[8/20/2013 8:20:21 PM]

Download 80318.pdf