Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 10th District Court of Appeals » 2001 » Jon Stuart Baughman v. Tonya R. Baughman & In the Interest of D.B., a Child--Appeal from 19th District Court of McLennan County
Jon Stuart Baughman v. Tonya R. Baughman & In the Interest of D.B., a Child--Appeal from 19th District Court of McLennan County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 10-01-00101-CV
Case Date: 12/05/2001
Plaintiff: Donnie Ray Tisby, Jr.
Defendant: The State of Texas--Appeal from 3rd District Court of Anderson County
Preview:Jon Stuart Baughman v. Tonya R. Baughman & In the
Interest of D.B., a Child--Appeal from 19th District
Court of McLennan County
IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-01-101-CV
JON STUART BAUGHMAN,
Appellant
v.
TONYA R. BAUGHMAN
Appellee
AND IN THE INTEREST OF
D.B., A CHILD
From the 19th District Court
McLennan County, Texas
Trial Court # 97-2399-1,2
CONCURRING OPINION
I disagree with the majority opinion on two issues, neither of which would change the result.
First, I do not believe that section 13.003 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code applies to cases, like this, where no
affidavit of inability to pay costs in the trial court was filed under Rule 145 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. Tex. Civ.
Prac. & Rem. Code 13.003 (Vernon Supp. 2002). I understand that from a literal reading of the section, out of context,
it appears to apply. However, in 1993, the Legislature added it to the chapter entitled Affidavit of Inability to Pay Costs
dealing with the filing of frivolous suits in the trial court and in 1995 amended it. In each instance, the caption contains
the phrase appeals in which an affidavit of inability to pay costs has been filed. // Section 13.003 should be read in
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/7119.html[8/20/2013 7:22:34 PM]




context with sections 13.001, 13.002, and 13.004 to apply only when they apply.
Second, I would apply an abuse-of-discretion standard in reviewing the trial court s decision on an affidavit filed
under Appellate Rule 20.1, rather than a legal and factual sufficiency review. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1.
Because I do not believe that the trial court abused its discretion in denying a free record in this instance, I concur in
affirming the court s order.
BILL VANCE
Justice
Concurring opinion delivered and filed December 5, 2001
Publish
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/7119.html[8/20/2013 7:22:34 PM]





Download 7119.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips