Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 7th District Court of Appeals » 2002 » Joseph Christentary v. The State of Texas--Appeal from Criminal District Court of Jefferson County
Joseph Christentary v. The State of Texas--Appeal from Criminal District Court of Jefferson County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 07-02-00299-CR
Case Date: 11/19/2002
Plaintiff: Sha-Ron Donte Berry a/k/a Sharon Donte Berry
Defendant: State of Texas--Appeal from 252nd District Court of Jefferson County
Preview:Sha-Ron Donte Berry a/k/a Sharon Donte Berry v. State
of Texas--Appeal from 252nd District Court of
Jefferson County
Opinion filed February 14, 2008
Opinion filed February 14, 2008
In The
Eleventh Court of Appeals
No. 11-07-00130-CR
SHA-RON DONTE BERRY A/K/A SHARON DONTE BERRY, Appellant
V.
STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 88059
O P I N I O N
The jury convicted Sha-Ron Donte Berry a/k/a Sharon Donte Berry of aggravated assault and assessed his punishment
at confinement for thirteen years.[1] We affirm.
Appellant=s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The motion is supported by a brief in which
counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and states that he has concluded
that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel has provided appellant with a copy of the brief and advised appellant of his right
to review the record and file a response to counsel=s brief. A response has not been filed. Court-appointed counsel has
complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1991); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); Eaden v. State, 161 S.W.3d 173 (Tex.
App.CEastland 2005, no pet.).
Following the procedures outlined in Anders, we have independently reviewed the record, and we agree that the appeal
is without merit. We note that counsel has the responsibility to advise appellant within five days from the date of this
opinion that appellant may file a petition for discretionary review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Tex. R.
App. P. 48.4; Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Likewise, this court advises appellant that he
may file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 66. Black v. State, 217 S.W.3d 687 (Tex.
App.CEastland 2007, no pet.).
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/8895.html[8/20/2013 7:30:21 PM]




The motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
February 14, 2008
Do not publish. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
McCall, J., and Strange, J.
[1]This is the second appeal from the conviction. In his first appeal, the Texarkana Court of Appeals affirmed the
conviction but reversed and remanded for new punishment. Berry v. State, 179 S.W.3d 175 (Tex. App.CTexarkana
2005, no pet.).
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/8895.html[8/20/2013 7:30:21 PM]





Download 8895.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips