Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 13th District Court of Appeals » 2002 » JOYCE SHAW v. BILL DUNN--Appeal from County Court at Law No 3 of Nueces County
JOYCE SHAW v. BILL DUNN--Appeal from County Court at Law No 3 of Nueces County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 13-02-00580-CV
Case Date: 11/27/2002
Plaintiff: JOYCE SHAW
Defendant: BILL DUNN--Appeal from County Court at Law No 3 of Nueces County
Preview:JOYCE SHAW v. BILL DUNN--Appeal from County
Court at Law No 3 of Nueces County
NUMBER 13-02-580-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
JOYCE SHAW, Appellant,
v.
BILL DUNN, Appellee.
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3
of Nueces County, Texas
O P I N I O N
Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo
Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, JOYCE SHAW, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 3
of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 97-60337-3. Judgment in this cause was signed on June 26, 2002. A timely
motion for new trial was filed on July 9, 2002. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant=s notice of appeal was due
on September 24, 2002, but was not filed until October 16, 2002.
Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was
advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal
would be dismissed. Appellant=s untimely motion for leave to file notice of appeal was received on October 22, 2002.
Appellee=s response was received and filed on October 25, 2002.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to timely perfect her
appeal, appellant=s untimely motion for leave to file notice of appeal, and appellee=s response, is of the opinion that
appellant=s motion should be denied and the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant=s motion
for leave to file notice of appeal is DENIED. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PSDs2/12439.html[8/20/2013 9:22:48 PM]




Tex. R. App. P.47.3.
Opinion delivered and filed this
the 27th day of November, 2002.
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PSDs2/12439.html[8/20/2013 9:22:48 PM]





Download 12439.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips