Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 4th District Court of Appeals » 1998 » Juan Vela v. Texas State Bank--Appeal from 381st Judicial District Court of Starr County
Juan Vela v. Texas State Bank--Appeal from 381st Judicial District Court of Starr County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 04-98-00632-CV
Case Date: 11/30/1998
Plaintiff: Texas Kenworth Company
Defendant: BMR Transport--Appeal from 4th District Court of Rusk County
Preview:Rosemary Ei-Ling Lohmann v. George Young
Lohmann, Jr.--Appeal from 318th District Court of
Midland County
11th Court of Appeals
Eastland, Texas
Memorandum Opinion
Rosemary Ei-Ling Lohmann
Appellant
Vs. No. 11-04-00241-CV -- Appeal from Midland County
George Young Lohmann, Jr.
Appellee
Appellant, Rosemary Ei-Ling Lohmann, filed her notice of appeal in this cause on September 23, 2004, from a
judgment signed by the trial court on September 16, 2004. This court advised appellant in a letter dated September 29,
2004, that the appellate record was due for filing in this court on or before November 15, 2004.[1] See TEX.R.APP.P.
35.1. The trial court clerk=s office filed an affidavit with this court on November 18, 2004, wherein Angie Welch,
Assistant Chief Deputy for Vivian Wood, District Clerk of Midland County, stated that the office had not received a
designation of items to be included in the clerk=s record and that no financial arrangements had been made for the
preparation of the clerk=s record. This court advised appellant=s counsel in a letter dated November 19, 2004, that the
appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless the designation of items to be included in the clerk=s record
was filed and sufficient financial arrangements for the preparation of the clerk=s record were made within 15 days of
the date of the letter.[2] See TEX.R.APP.P. 35.3(a)(2) & 42.3.
As of this date, appellant has neither filed a designation of the items to be included in the clerk=s record nor made
sufficient financial arrangements for the preparation of the clerk=s record. Pursuant to Rule 42.3, we dismiss the appeal
for want of prosecution.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
PER CURIAM
January 31, 2005
Not designated for publication. See TEX.R.APP.P. 47.2(a).
Panel consists of: Arnot, C.J., and
Wright, J., and McCall, J.
[1]Appellant indicated in her docketing statement that a reporter=s record would not be requested.
[2]This court sent the letter of November 19, 2004, to appellant=s counsel by certified mail, return receipt requested.
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/7767.html[8/20/2013 7:24:07 PM]




The return receipt indicates that counsel received the letter on November 22, 2004.
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/7767.html[8/20/2013 7:24:07 PM]





Download 7767.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips