KENNETH AVERY FARR, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

State: Texas

Court: Texas Northern District Court

Docket No: 05-09-00060-CR,

Case Date: 11/30/2009

Plaintiff: KENNETH AVERY FARR, Appellant

Defendant: THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Preview:KENNETH AVERY FARR, Appellant v. THE STATE
OF TEXAS, Appellee
AFFIRM and Opinion Filed November 25, 2009
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-09-00060-CR
No. 05-09-00061-CR
KENNETH AVERY FARR, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F08-14292-UM, F08-59527-RM
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Morris, O'Neill, and Fillmore
Opinion By Justice O'Neill
Kenneth Avery Farr appeals from his convictions for forgery by check and theft enhanced by prior theft
convictions. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes these appeals are wholly frivolous and
without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a
professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v.
State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We
advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the
appeals.
We affirm the trial court's judgment in each case.
MICHAEL J. O'NEILL
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/05-09-00061-cr-5.html[8/20/2013 6:48:43 PM]

Tex. R. App. P. 47
090060F.U05
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/05-09-00061-cr-5.html[8/20/2013 6:48:43 PM]

Download 05-09-00061-cr-5.pdf