Kent Anthony Krueger v. The State of Texas--Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Comal County

State: Texas

Court: Texas Northern District Court

Docket No: 03-93-00409-CR

Case Date: 01/12/1994

Plaintiff: Darrell Lee Boston

Defendant: The State of Texas--Appeal from 40th District Court of Ellis County

Preview:Darrell Lee Boston v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 40th District Court of Ellis County
MAJORITY | MAJORITY IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-90-223-CR

DARRELL LEE BOSTON, Appellant v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 40th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court # 17,834

OPINION ON REMAND

On original submission we reversed Darrell Lee Boston's conviction for robbery, holding that the trial court's refusal to allow Boston to make an opening statement before the State's presentation of evidence was error, and that such error was not harmless. // Subsequently, a majority of the Court of Criminal Appeals in Moore v. State held that article 36.01(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not afford criminal defendants the right to make an opening statement prior to presentation of the State's case when the State does not make an opening statement. // As a result, the Court of Criminal Appeals summarily granted the State's petition for discretionary review, reversed the judgment of this court in Boston and remanded the case to us for reconsideration in light of their opinion in Moore. // In Moore, the Court of Criminal Appeals held that article 36.01(b) is inapplicable in cases in which the State waives opening statement. // On original submission, Boston raised a single point of error complaining only of the trial court's refusal to allow him to make an opening statement before the State's presentation of evidence pursuant to article

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/6957.html[8/20/2013 7:22:09 PM]

36.01(b). However, as in Moore, the State waived opening statement in this case. Furthermore, Boston has not filed a brief on remand urging other grounds for reversal in light of Moore. // Consequently, in accordance with the opinion and judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals, we now affirm the judgment of the trial court. PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Thomas, Justice Cummings, and Justice Vance Affirmed Opinion delivered and filed July 13, 1994 Publish

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/6957.html[8/20/2013 7:22:09 PM]

Download 6957.pdf