Larry Michael Francis v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division Publication Reviewer, Mail System Coordinator's Panel, Deputy Director Jennifer Smith, Mailroom Representative S. W

State: Texas

Court: Texas Northern District Court

Docket No: 10-08-00154-CV

Case Date: 12/17/2008

Plaintiff: Brad Vaughn and East Coast Directional Drilling, Inc.

Defendant: Intrepid Directional Drilling Specialists, Ltd.--Appeal from 142nd District Court of Midland County

Preview:Jose Luis Medelez, Jr. v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 9th District Court of Montgomery County
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-06-341 CR NO. 09-06-342 CR ____________________ JOSE LUIS MEDELEZ, JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 9th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 04-07-06023-CR and 03-06-04345-CR MEMORANDUM OPINION Jose Luis Medelez, Jr. appeals following the revocation of deferred adjudication community supervision and imposition of a five-year sentence for indecency with a child by exposure in Cause No. 03-06-04345-CR and the revocation of "shock" community supervision and execution of a ten-year sentence for aggravated robbery in Cause No. 04-07-06023-CR. On appeal, counsel for Medelez filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the records and concludes the appeals are frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On November 8, 2007, we granted an extension of time for the appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from appellant. We reviewed the appellate records, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support the appeals. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeals. Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgments. (1) AFFIRMED. _________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON Justice

Submitted on February 5, 2008 Opinion Delivered February 13, 2008 Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ. 1. Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P.

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/9326.html[8/20/2013 7:31:29 PM]

68.

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/9326.html[8/20/2013 7:31:29 PM]

Download 9326.pdf