Latrenda S. Cartwright v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 252nd District Court of Jefferson County

State: Texas

Court: Texas Northern District Court

Docket No: 09-06-00493-CR

Case Date: 10/03/2007

Plaintiff: Donald Bradley Farris

Defendant: State of Texas--Appeal from 238th District Court of Midland County

Preview:Latrenda S. Cartwright v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 252nd District Court of Jefferson County
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-06-493 CR ____________________ LATRENDA S. CARTWRIGHT, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 94684 MEMORANDUM OPINION Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant Latrenda S. Cartwright pled no contest to assault on a public servant. On November 28, 2005, the trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Cartwright guilty, but deferred further proceedings, placed Cartwright on community supervision for two years, and assessed a fine of $250. On March 10, 2006, the State filed a motion to revoke Cartwright's unadjudicated community supervision. Cartwright pled "not true" to four alleged violations of the conditions of her community supervision. After holding a hearing, the trial court found that Cartwright violated three of the conditions of her community supervision, found Cartwright guilty of assault on a public servant, and assessed punishment at five years of confinement. Cartwright's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On June 21, 2007, we granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from appellant. We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment. (1) AFFIRMED.

_________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON Justice

Submitted on September 21, 2007 Opinion Delivered October 3, 2007 Do Not Publish

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/9173.html[8/20/2013 7:31:07 PM]

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ. 1. Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/9173.html[8/20/2013 7:31:07 PM]

Download 9173.pdf