Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 10th District Court of Appeals » 2005 » Mathew Barbosa Tyree v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 248th District Court of Harris County
Mathew Barbosa Tyree v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 248th District Court of Harris County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 10-04-00171-CR
Case Date: 07/06/2005
Plaintiff: David Bruce Taylor
Defendant: The State of Texas--Appeal from 114th District Court of Smith County
Preview:Mathew Barbosa Tyree v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 248th District Court of Harris County
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-04-00171-CR Mathew Barbosa Tyree, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

From the 248th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court No. 9418625 MEMORANDUM Opinion

Tyree appeals the revocation of his deferred-adjudication community supervision for aggravated robbery. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42.12, 5 (Vernon Supp. 2004-2005); Tex. Penal Code Ann. 29.03(a) (Vernon 2003). Tyree s counsel filed an Anders brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). We affirm. The brief thoroughly reviews: (1) Tyree s opportunity to present punishment evidence, (2) the validity of the community-supervision order, (3) the effective assistance of Tyree s trial counsel, and (4) the validity of the sentence. Counsel states: After a thorough review of the record Appellant s appointed counsel on appeal is unable to find any error which he, in good faith, can urge as warranting a reversal of the judgment of conviction. Although counsel informed Tyree of the right to file a brief, Tyree did not file one. The State waived the filing of a response. We must, after a full examination of all the proceedings, . . . decide whether the case is wholly frivolous. Anders at 744; accord Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Coronado v. State, 996 S.W.2d 283, 285 (Tex. App. Waco 1999, order) (per curiam), disp. on merits, 25 S.W.3d 806 (Tex. App. Waco 2000, pet. ref d). An appeal is wholly frivolous or without merit when it lacks any basis in law or fact. McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 439 n.10 (1988). Arguments are frivolous when they cannot conceivably persuade the court. Id. at 436. An appeal is not wholly frivolous when it is based on arguable grounds. Stafford at 511. We determine that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm. Counsel must advise Tyree of our decision and of his right to file a petition for discretionary review. See Sowels v. State, 45 S.W.3d 690, 694 (Tex. App. Waco 2001, no pet.).
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/6638.html[8/20/2013 7:21:26 PM]

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Vance, and Justice Reyna Affirmed Opinion delivered and filed July 6, 2005 Do not publish [CRPM]

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/6638.html[8/20/2013 7:21:26 PM]

Download 6638.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips