Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 13th District Court of Appeals » 2010 » MICHAEL RAY CUELLAR v. THE STATE OF TEXAS--Appeal from 24th District Court of De Witt County
MICHAEL RAY CUELLAR v. THE STATE OF TEXAS--Appeal from 24th District Court of De Witt County
State: Texas
Court: Criminal Court of Appeals
Docket No: 13-09-00063-CR
Case Date: 01/21/2010
Plaintiff: MICHAEL RAY CUELLAR
Defendant: THE STATE OF TEXAS--Appeal from 24th District Court of De Witt County
Preview:Federico Rojas-Mondragon a/k/a Frederico Mondragon-Rojas a/k/a Isias Ballejo Perez a/k/a Isaias Ballejo Peres v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 216th Judicial District Court of Gillespie County
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-04-00394-CR

Federico ROJAS-MONDRAGON a/k/a Isaias Ballejo Perez, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillepsie County, Texas Trial Court No. 4210 Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Alma L. L pez, Chief Justice Sitting: Alma L. L pez, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 8, 2005

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/18257.html[8/20/2013 7:46:21 PM]

AFFIRMED Federico Rojas-Mondragon a/k/a Isaias Ballejo Perez appeals his conviction of burglary of a habitation with intent to commit a felony. A jury found Rojas-Mondragon guilty and assessed his sentence at twenty-five years imprisonment. Rojas-Mondragon s court-appointed attorney filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he concludes that the appeal has no merit. // Counsel provided Rojas-Mondragon with a copy of the brief and informed him of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App. San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App. San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Rojas-Mondragon did not file a pro se brief. We have reviewed the record and counsel s brief. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel s motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.

Alma L. L pez, Chief, Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/18257.html[8/20/2013 7:46:21 PM]

Download 18257.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips