Monarch Assets, Inc. v. Concourse Professional Suites, Inc.--Appeal from 162nd District Court of Dallas County

State: Texas

Court: Texas Northern District Court

Docket No: 08-03-00030-CV

Case Date: 10/16/2003

Plaintiff: Monarch Assets, Inc.

Defendant: Concourse Professional Suites, Inc.--Appeal from 162nd District Court of Dallas County

Preview:Monarch Assets, Inc. v. Concourse Professional Suites, Inc.--Appeal from 162nd District Court of Dallas County
Becker v. State COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ) MONARCH ASSETS, INC., ) No. 08-03-00030-CV) Appellant, ) Appeal from) v. ) 162nd District Court) CONCOURSE PROFESSIONAL SUITES, ) of Dallas County, Texas INC., ) ) (TC# DV02-02564-I) Appellee. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This appeal is before the Court on its own motion for determination of whether it should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that the Appellant has failed to file a brief or respond to our inquiry letter, we dismiss the appeal. FACTS On June 26, 2003, this Court informed Appellant by letter that its brief was past due and no motion for extension of time had been filed. The Court advised Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed unless it responded within ten days and provided a reason why the appeal should be continued. See Tex.R.App.P. 38.8. No reply has been filed. This Court possesses the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when appellant has failed to file its brief in the time prescribed, and gives no reasonable explanation for such failure. Tex.R.App.P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v.

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/62547.html[8/20/2013 8:06:28 PM]

City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Tex.App.--San Antonio 1998, no writ). We have given notice of our intent to do so, requested a response if a reasonable basis for failure to file the brief exists, and have received none. We see no purpose that would be served by declining to dismiss this appeal at this stage of the proceedings. Pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(c) and 38.8(a)(1), we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

October 16, 2003 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Panel No. 2 Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/62547.html[8/20/2013 8:06:28 PM]

Download 62547.pdf