Oscar Zubia v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 384th District Court of El Paso County

State: Texas

Court: Texas Northern District Court

Docket No: 08-06-00149-CR

Case Date: 12/14/2006

Plaintiff: Oscar Zubia

Defendant: The State of Texas--Appeal from 384th District Court of El Paso County

Preview:Oscar Zubia v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 384th
District Court of El Paso County
Criminal Case Template /**/
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
OSCAR ZUBIA,
Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee.
No. 08-06-00149-CR
Appeal from the
384th District Court
of El Paso County, Texas
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/64061.html[8/20/2013 8:12:46 PM]

(TC# 20020D05095)
O P I N I O N
Appellant waived trial by jury and entered a plea of guilty before the court to the offense of indecency with a child by
sexual contact. The court assessed punishment at seven years community supervision-deferred. Subsequently, an
amended motion to adjudicate guilt was filed by the District Attorney. After a hearing upon that motion, the court
adjudicated Appellant guilty and assessed punishment at twenty years in the Institutional Division of the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice. We affirm.
Appellant s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he has concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous and
without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493,
reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record
demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel s brief has been
delivered to Appellant, and Appellant has been advised of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se
brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel s brief and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without
merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. A discussion of the contentions
advanced in counsel s brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.
The judgment is affirmed.
KENNETH R. CARR, Justice
December 14, 2006
Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.
(Do Not Publish)
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/64061.html[8/20/2013 8:12:46 PM]

Download 64061.pdf