Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 4th District Court of Appeals » 2006 » Patricia Ann Arredondo v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 186th Judicial District Court of Bexar County
Patricia Ann Arredondo v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 186th Judicial District Court of Bexar County
State: Texas
Court: Criminal Court of Appeals
Docket No: 04-06-00420-CR
Case Date: 11/29/2006
Plaintiff: Derrick Demond Terrell a/k/a Derrick Terrell
Defendant: The State of Texas--Appeal from 213th District Court of Tarrant County
Preview:Patricia Ann Arredondo v. The State of Texas--Appeal
from 186th Judicial District Court of Bexar County
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-06-00420-CR
Patricia Ann ARRENDONDO,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas ,
Appellee
From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2004-CR-8478
Honorable Teresa Herr , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Alma L. L pez, Chief Justice
Catherine Stone , Justice
Rebecca Simmons , Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 29, 2006
DISMISSED
The trial court's certification in this appeal states that "the defendant has waived his [sic] right of appeal." Rule 25.2(d)
of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, "[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the
defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules." Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
Appellant's counsel has filed written notice with this court that counsel has reviewed the record and can find no right
of appeal for appellant. Because appellant appeared to believe the trial court did not follow the plea bargain, we
provided appellant an opportunity to supplement the record. On July 25, 2006, we warned that this appeal would be
dismissed, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless appellant could provide proof that the trial
court did not comply with the terms of the plea bargain or an amended trial court certification showing that appellant
has the right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.--San Antonio
2003, order). Appellant did not respond. In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant's counsel that Rule
25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/19742.html[8/20/2013 8:01:28 PM]




file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/19742.html[8/20/2013 8:01:28 PM]





Download 19742.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips