Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 2nd District Court of Appeals » 2007 » Paula Brock v. The State of Texas--Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 5 of Denton County
Paula Brock v. The State of Texas--Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 5 of Denton County
State: Texas
Court: Criminal Court of Appeals
Docket No: 02-06-00452-CR
Case Date: 11/01/2007
Plaintiff: STEVEN GREY
Defendant: THE STATE OF TEXAS (Concurring)
Preview:Richard Novelo d/b/a R&M International Productions
v. William Babcock--Appeal from County Court at Law
No 7 of Bexar County
/**/
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-05-00678-CV
Richard NOVELO d/b/a R & M International Productions,
Appellant
v.
William BABCOCK,
Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 299229
Honorable Timothy Johnson, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 15, 2006
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/18976.html[8/20/2013 7:47:57 PM]




On October 26, 2005, we received a letter from the court reporter, Candy Zavala, stating that she did not take a record
in this case and that she had not received a designation of record from the appellant, Richard Novelo d/b/a R & M
International Productions. Thus, because there was no reporter s record and no designation of a reporter s record, on
October 26, 2005, the clerk of this court notified appellant that his brief was due on November 28, 2005. Neither the
brief nor a motion for extension of time was filed.
On January 5, 2006, we ordered Richard Novelo d/b/a R & M International Productions to file, on or before January
25, 2006, his appellant s brief and a written response reasonably explaining (1) his failure to timely file the brief and
(2) why appellee is not significantly injured by his failure to timely file a brief. We warned that if Novelo failed to file
a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R.
App. P. 38.8(a). Novelo did not file a brief or a written response. We, therefore, dismiss this appeal for want of
prosecution. See id.
PER CURIAM
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/18976.html[8/20/2013 7:47:57 PM]





Download 18976.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips