Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 12th District Court of Appeals » 2010 » Ronald Smith v. America's Best Value Inn & Suites--Appeal from 114th District Court of Smith County
Ronald Smith v. America's Best Value Inn & Suites--Appeal from 114th District Court of Smith County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 12-10-00292-CV
Case Date: 09/30/2010
Plaintiff: Kenneth Paul Washington, Jr.
Defendant: The State of Texas--Appeal from 252nd District Court of Jefferson County
Preview:NO. 12-10-00292-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
RONALD SMITH, APPELLANT V. AMERICA'S BEST VALUE INN & SUITES, APPELLEE

' ' '

APPEAL FROM THE 114TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed because Appellant, Ronald Smith, has failed to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Pursuant to rule 32.1, Smith's docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., August 31, 2010. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. On September 2, 2010, this court notified Smith that he should file a docketing statement immediately if he had not already done so. By separate letter, also dated September 2, 2010, this court requested that Smith pay his filing fee on or before September 13, 2010. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. Because Smith did not pay his filing fee or file the docketing statement as requested in the September 2, 2010 letters, this court issued a second notice on September 17, 2010, advising Smith that the filing fee and the docketing statement were past due. The notice further provided that unless the filing fee was paid and the

docketing statement filed on or before September 27, 2010, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. The September 27 deadline has passed, and Smith has not complied with the court's request. Because Smith has failed, after notice, to comply with rules 5 and 32.1, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Opinion delivered September 30, 2010.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Download 9515.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips