Star Houston, Inc., d/b/a Star Motor Cars v. Brett Bray in his Official Capacity as Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation; and Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC--Appeal

State: Texas

Court: Criminal Court of Appeals

Docket No: 03-09-00508-CV

Case Date: 04/28/2010

Plaintiff: ALEJANDRO SANTOS AND MARTHA MONICA SANTOS

Defendant: MADELYN HOLZMAN, M. D., INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A UROLOGIC SPECIALISTS ASSOCIATES, P. A.--Appeal from

Preview:Stephen Dee Bonet v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 226th Judicial District Court of Bexar County
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-05-00035-CR Stephen Dee BONET, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas , Appellee From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2000-CR-2792 Honorable Sid Harle , Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Karen Angelini , Justice Sitting: Sarah B. Duncan , Justice Karen Angelini , Justice Phylis J. Speedlin , Justice Delivered and Filed: April 12, 2006 AFFIRMED On February 6, 2001, pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Stephen Dee Bonet pled guilty to driving while intoxicated, third offense, and was placed on community supervision for a period of five years. On August 22, 2004, the State moved to revoke his community supervision, alleging that he had violated a condition of his community supervision by driving without a valid license. At the revocation hearing, Bonet pled true to having violated a condition of his community supervision. The trial court revoked his community supervision and sentenced him to three years imprisonment. Bonet timely filed a notice of appeal. His court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief in which she raises two arguable points of error, but nonetheless concludes that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Counsel states that appellant was provided with a copy of the brief and motion to withdraw and was further informed of his right to review the record and file his own brief. Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Bonet did not file a pro se brief. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Furthermore, we GRANT the motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. Karen Angelini , Justice Do not publish
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/19103.html[8/20/2013 7:48:14 PM]

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/19103.html[8/20/2013 7:48:14 PM]

Download 19103.pdf