The State of Texas and Texas Department of Transportation v. George M. Delany and Patricia Ann Delany--Appeal from 212th District Court of Galveston County

State: Texas

Court: Texas Northern District Court

Docket No: 14-03-00052-CV

Case Date: 11/18/2004

Plaintiff: The State of Texas and Texas Department of Transportation

Defendant: George M. Delany and Patricia Ann Delany--Appeal from 212th District Court of Galveston County

Preview:In re: Ruben Guajardo--Appeal from 122nd District Court of Galveston County
Opinion issued March 11, 2004

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ____________

NO. 01-04-00133-CR ____________

IN RE RUBEN GUAJARDO, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator contends in his petition for writ of mandamus that, due to a clerical error, he is serving consecutive sentences in cause numbers 91-CR-0734 and 91-CR-0608, rather than concurrent sentences. Relator further contends that he filed a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc in the 56th District Court that the court denied. // Relator s petition does not meet the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure because it does not certify that a copy was served on a respondent. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5. In addition, the documents attached to relator s petition do not provide the Court with a sufficient record upon which relief could be granted. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex.1992); see Tex. R. App. P. 52.3. We therefore deny the petition for writ of mandamus. It is so ORDERED. PER CURIAM

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/80275.html[8/20/2013 8:20:14 PM]

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Alcala and Bland. Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/80275.html[8/20/2013 8:20:14 PM]

Download 80275.pdf