Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 12th District Court of Appeals » 2006 » Tony Joseph Breaux v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 124th District Court of Gregg County
Tony Joseph Breaux v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 124th District Court of Gregg County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 12-05-00279-CR
Case Date: 10/25/2006
Plaintiff: Tony Joseph Breaux
Defendant: The State of Texas--Appeal from 124th District Court of Gregg County
Preview:Ernesto C. Mendoza v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 266th District Court of Erath County
/**/ 11th Court of Appeals Eastland, Texas Opinion Ernesto C. Mendoza Appellant Vs. No. 11-05-00004-CR -- Appeal from Erath County State of Texas Appellee This is an appeal from an order denying Ernesto C. Mendoza s motion for post-conviction forensic DNA testing pursuant to TEX. CODE CRIM. PRO. ANN. art. 64.01 et seq. (Vernon Pamph. Supp. 2004 - 2005). We affirm. Appellant s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and states that he has concluded that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel has provided appellant with a copy of the brief and advised appellant of his right to review the record and file a response to counsel s brief. Appellant has not filed a pro se response. Court-appointed counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex.Cr.App.1991); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Cr.App.1969); Eaden v. State, No. 11-03-00405-CR, 2005 WL 309558 (Tex.App. - Eastland, February 10, 2005, no pet n)(not yet reported). Following the procedures outlined in Anders, we have independently reviewed the record, and we agree that the appeal is without merit. The record reflects that no biological evidence was seized. Article 64.03. The motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. April 14, 2005 PER CURIAM Do not publish. See TEX.R.APP.P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Arnot, C.J., and Wright, J., and McCall, J .

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/7847.html[8/20/2013 7:24:16 PM]

Download 7847.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips