Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 4th District Court of Appeals » 2011 » Valentine Hale v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 175th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (Majority)
Valentine Hale v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 175th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (Majority)
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 04-11-00296-CR
Case Date: 12/14/2011
Plaintiff: Valentine Hale
Defendant: The State of Texas--Appeal from 175th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (Majority)
Preview:MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-11-00296-CR Valentine HALE, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009CR9120W Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 14, 2011 AFFIRMED Based on Valentine Hale's plea of true to violating the terms of his community supervision, the trial court revoked Hale's community supervision and sentenced him to five years imprisonment. Hale's court-appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel concludes that the appeal has no merit. Counsel provided Hale with a copy of the brief and informed him of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954

04-11-00296-CR

S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Hale did not file a pro se brief. After reviewing the record and counsel's brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel's request to withdraw is granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Hale wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Hale must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or Hale must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the later of: (1) the date of this opinion; or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4. Catherine Stone, Chief Justice DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Download 04-11-00296-cr-1.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips