Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 6th District Court of Appeals » 2002 » Virdis Bonner v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 202nd District Court of Bowie County
Virdis Bonner v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 202nd District Court of Bowie County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 06-02-00066-CR
Case Date: 04/26/2002
Plaintiff: Robert Howard Dennis, Sr.
Defendant: Catherine Denise Dennis--Appeal from County Court at Law of Cherokee County
Preview:Virdis Bonner v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 202nd District Court of Bowie County
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-02-00066-CR ______________________________ VIRDIS L. BONNER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 202nd Judicial District Court Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 96-F-343-202 Before Cornelius, C.J., Grant and Ross, JJ. Opinion by Justice Grant OPINION Virdis Bonner appeals his conviction for assault on a public servant, enhanced by a prior felony conviction. The jury assessed his punishment at ten years' imprisonment, which the trial court ordered to run consecutively with a sentence Bonner was serving in a federal prison. The trial court sentenced Bonner on February 20, 2002. Bonner did not file a motion for new trial; therefore, his Notice of Appeal was due by March 22, 2002, or with a proper request for an extension, by April 8, 2002. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1), 26.3. Bonner filed his Notice of Appeal pro se on April 2, 2002, and the record does not show he filed a request for an extension. There is nothing in the record showing the mailbox rule applies to make the Notice of Appeal timely. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b). Therefore, because Bonner did not file a timely notice of appeal, this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). (1) The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Ben Z. Grant Justice

Date Submitted: April 26, 2002 Date Decided: April 26, 2002

Do Not Publish 1. In Olivo, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals noted the denial of a meaningful appeal because of ineffective assistance of counsel is a proper ground for habeas corpus relief. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 525 n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2002).

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/6083.html[8/20/2013 7:20:00 PM]

Download 6083.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips