Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 10th District Court of Appeals » 1998 » William David Easley v. Tammie Yannette Easley--Appeal from 19th District Court of McLennan County
William David Easley v. Tammie Yannette Easley--Appeal from 19th District Court of McLennan County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 10-98-00123-CV
Case Date: 11/04/1998
Plaintiff: William David Easley
Defendant: Tammie Yannette Easley--Appeal from 19th District Court of McLennan County
Preview:William David Easley v. Tammie Yannette Easley-Appeal from 19th District Court of McLennan County
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-98-123-CV

WILLIAM DAVID EASLEY, Appellant v.

TAMMIE YANNETTE EASLEY, Appellee

From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court # 92-0871-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION William David Easley filed a pro se notice of appeal in this Court on May 14, 1998. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(c). The clerk s record was due on July 13, 1998. It has not been filed because Easley has not paid nor made arrangements to pay the clerk s fee for preparing the record. Appellate Rule 37.3(b) provides that if an appellant fails to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk s fee for preparation of the record, the Court may: dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payments of costs. The court must give the appellant a reasonable opportunity to cure before dismissal.

Id. 37.3(b). After liberally construing correspondence from Easley as a request for time to make arrangements to pay the clerk s fee and granting a thirty-day extension, the fee still has not been paid. We notified Easley that failure to pay for the record by September 25 would result in dismissal. // Id. 37.3(b), 42.3, 44.3. Over thirty days have passed since the deadline and no arrangements have been made. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Id. 37.3(b).

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/2692.html[8/20/2013 7:12:33 PM]

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Davis, Justice Cummings, and Justice Vance Dismissed for want of prosecution Opinion delivered and filed November 4, 1998 Do not publish

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/2692.html[8/20/2013 7:12:33 PM]

Download 2692.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips