Johnson v. Town and Shepherd, Case No. 20051039-CA, Filed October 13, 2006, 2006 UT App 423

State: Utah

Docket No: 20051039-CA

Case Date: 10/13/2006

Plaintiff: Johnson

Defendant: Town and Shepherd, Case No. 20051039-CA, Filed October 13, 2006, 2006 UT App 423

Preview:IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS ----ooOoo---Reynold Johnson, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Levan Town and Robert Shepherd, Defendants and Appellees. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM DECISION (Not For Official Publication) Case No. 20051039-CA F I L E D (October 13, 2006) 2006 UT App 423

----Fourth District, Nephi Department, 040600040 The Honorable Donald J. Eyre Jr. Attorneys: Reynold Johnson, Levan, Appellant Pro Se Denton M. Hatch, Spanish Fork, for Appellee ----Before Judges Bench, Greenwood, and Thorne. PER CURIAM: Reynold Johnson appeals the judgment of the district court. We affirm on the basis that Johnson's claims are inadequately briefed. "It is well established that a reviewing court will not address arguments that are not adequately briefed." State v. Thomas, 961 P.2d 299, 304 (Utah 1998); see also Valcarce v. Fitzgerald, 961 P.2d 305, 313 (Utah 1998) (declining to address appellant's claim on appeal due to inadequate analysis). Furthermore, while "this court generally is lenient with pro se litigants," Lundahl v. Quinn, 2003 UT 11,

Download johnson101306.pdf