Preview:

IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS ----ooOoo---Michael Paul Maness, Petitioner, v. Department of Commerce, Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ----Original Proceeding in this Court Attorneys: Michael Paul Maness, LaVerkin, Petitioner Pro Se Mark L. Shurtleff and Nancy L. Kemp, Salt Lake City, for Respondent ----Before Judges Billings, Davis, and McHugh. PER CURIAM: Michael Paul Maness petitions for review from the revocation of his massage therapist license. This is before the court on the Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing's (DOPL) motion for summary disposition based on the lack of a substantial question for review. On review, Maness challenges only DOPL's failure to add material to the record on agency review. Maness asserts that the preliminary hearing transcript in his criminal case and a recording made in the course of the criminal case should be part of the administrative record on review, although the materials were not made a part of the record of the adjudicative proceeding. However, it is well settled that new material may not be added to the record on review or appeal. See State v. Law, 2003 UT App 228,

Download maness051508.pdf

Utah Law