Preview:

West Valley City v. Pettengill. Filed July 29, 1999
IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS
----ooOoo----

West Valley City,
Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.
Michael E. Pettengill,
Defendant and Appellant.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
(Not For Official Publication)
Case No. 990293-CA

F I L E D
July 29, 1999


Third District, West Valley Department
The Honorable Ann Boyden

Attorneys:
Michael E. Pettengill, Appellant pro se

J. Richard Catten, West Valley City, for Appellee
Before Judges Billings, Davis, and Jackson.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from a bench trial wherein he was convicted of two class B misdemeanors, assault and interference with a communication device. We affirm.
Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the trial court's ruling, but has not provided a transcript of the evidence presented to the trial court. In the absence of a transcript, this court is unable to determine whether the trial court's ruling was based upon sufficient evidence and will presume the correctness of the disposition made by the trial court. See Horton v. Gem State Mutual, 794 P.2d 847, 849 (Utah Ct. App.
1990). Accordingly, we presume the correctness of the trial court's ruling, and affirm the convictions.
Judith M. Billings, Judge
James Z. Davis, Judge
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/Opinions/petteng.htm[5/10/2013 7:01:45 PM]
West Valley City v. Pettengill. Filed July 29, 1999
Norman H. Jackson, Judge
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/Opinions/petteng.htm[5/10/2013 7:01:45 PM]

Download petteng.pdf

Utah Law