011390 Zelnick v. Adams 04/19/2002 The trial court erred in holding on summary judgment that the doctrine of necessaries did not apply to a contract for legal services on behalf of a minor. The judgme

SUPREME COURT CASES

Laws-info.com » Cases » Virginia » Supreme Court » 2002 » 011390 Zelnick v. Adams 04/19/2002 The trial court erred in holding on summary judgment that the doctrine of necessaries did not apply to a contract for legal services on behalf of a minor. The judgme

011390 Zelnick v. Adams 04/19/2002 The trial court erred in holding on summary judgment that the doctrine of necessaries did not apply to a contract for legal services on behalf of a minor. The judgme

State: Virginia

Court: Supreme Court

Docket No: 011390

Case Date: 04/19/2002

Plaintiff: 011390 Zelnick

Defendant: Adams 04/19/2002 The trial court erred in holding on summary judgment that the doctrine of necessar

Download 1011390.pdf

Virginia Law

Virginia State Laws

> Virginia Child Support

> Virginia Gun Laws

> Virginia Statutes

Virginia Court

> Virginia Courts Case Information

Virginia Labor Laws

> Jobs in Virginia

> Library of Virginia

> Virginia Governor

Virginia Tax

> Virginia State Tax

Virginia Agencies

> Better Business Bureau Virginia

> Virginia Department of Corrections

> Virginia Department of Health

> Virginia Department of Social Services

> Virginia Department of Taxation

> Virginia Department of Transportation

> Virginia Employment Commission

> Virginia Retirement System

Comments

Popular In Supreme Court Cases

Escobedo V Illinois Barron V Baltimore Brandenburg V Ohio John Wayne Gacy Marbury V Madison Miranda Arizona New Jersey V Tlo Famous Child Abuse Cases Richard Ramirez Gregg V Georgia Edwards V Aguillard Brown V Board Of Education

Tips