062368 Purce v. Patterson 01/11/2008 The trial court did not err in ruling that an estranged husband was not eligible for an elective share of the spouse's augmented estate under Code A

SUPREME COURT CASES

Laws-info.com » Cases » Virginia » Supreme Court » 2008 » 062368 Purce v. Patterson 01/11/2008 The trial court did not err in ruling that an estranged husband was not eligible for an elective share of the spouse's augmented estate under Code A

062368 Purce v. Patterson 01/11/2008 The trial court did not err in ruling that an estranged husband was not eligible for an elective share of the spouse's augmented estate under Code A

State: Virginia

Court: Supreme Court

Docket No: 062368

Case Date: 01/11/2008

Plaintiff: 062368 Purce

Defendant: Patterson 01/11/2008 The trial court did not err in ruling that an estranged husband was not eligib

Download 1062368.pdf

Virginia Law

Virginia State Laws

> Virginia Child Support

> Virginia Gun Laws

> Virginia Statutes

Virginia Court

> Virginia Courts Case Information

Virginia Labor Laws

> Jobs in Virginia

> Library of Virginia

> Virginia Governor

Virginia Tax

> Virginia State Tax

Virginia Agencies

> Better Business Bureau Virginia

> Virginia Department of Corrections

> Virginia Department of Health

> Virginia Department of Social Services

> Virginia Department of Taxation

> Virginia Department of Transportation

> Virginia Employment Commission

> Virginia Retirement System

Comments

Popular In Supreme Court Cases

Escobedo V Illinois Barron V Baltimore Brandenburg V Ohio John Wayne Gacy Marbury V Madison Miranda Arizona New Jersey V Tlo Famous Child Abuse Cases Richard Ramirez Gregg V Georgia Edwards V Aguillard Brown V Board Of Education

Tips