Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Washington » Supreme Court of Washington » 1970 » 3 Wn. App. 699, THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JAMES WILLARD HEARN, Appellant.
3 Wn. App. 699, THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JAMES WILLARD HEARN, Appellant.
State: Washington
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: 139-1
Case Date: 11/30/1970

3 Wn. App. 699, THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JAMES WILLARD HEARN, Appellant.

[No. 139-1. Division On - Panel 1. Court of Appeals      November 30, 1970.]

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JAMES WILLARD HEARN, Appellant.

Motion filed in the Court of Appeals to withdraw as counsel. Motion granted; appeal dismissed.

Lundin, Estep, Sindell & Haley and Donald D. Haley, for appellant (appointed counsel for appeal).

Charles O. Carroll, Prosecuting Attorney, and James J. Lamont, Deputy, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. -

Defendant appeals his conviction of burglary in the second degree. His counsel has submitted a brief setting forth the issues he considers arguably support the appeal but, having concluded these issues are without merit, has also moved to withdraw. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Appellant has been furnished a copy of the brief and time has been allowed for him to examine the entire record and the brief of his appointed counsel. Our review compels the conclusion the appeal is without merit and we also find no other points of potentially reversible error existing in the record.

The motion of defendant's counsel to withdraw and the state's motion to dismiss the appeal are granted.

Washington Law

Washington State Laws
Washington Court
    > Washington State Courts
Washington Labor Laws
    > Washington State Jobs
Washington State
    > Washington County Jail
Washington Tax
Washington Agencies
    > Washington DMV

Comments

Tips