55 Wn.2d 908, HELEN C. BEAGLE, Plaintiff v. HARVEY L. BEAGLE, Defendant and Relator, THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR KING COUNTY, William J. Wilkins, Judge, Respondent
[No. 35194. Department Two. Supreme Court February 4, 1960.]
HELEN C. BEAGLE, Plaintiff v. HARVEY L. BEAGLE, Defendant and Relator, THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR KING COUNTY, William J. Wilkins, Judge, Respondent.1
Motion filed in the Supreme Court January 6, 1960, to strike a statement of facts. Denied.
Cartano, Botzer & Chapman (Robert A. O'Neill, of counsel), for plaintiff.
Zundel, Merges, Brain & Isaac, for defendant and relator.
PER CURIAM. -
Respondent moves to strike the statement of facts from the record on appeal for the reason that it was not timely filed, in accordance with Rule on Appeal 34, RCW, Vol. 0. The proposed statement of facts was filed more than ninety days after entry of the decree. No application for extension of time for filing was filed within the ninety-day period, or at all. See Beagle v. Beagle, ante p. 174, 346 P. (2d) 689 (1959).
In the exercise of our discretion (since the timely filing of a statement of facts is no longer jurisdictional), we deny the motion to strike the statement of facts; but, pursuant to Rule on Appeal 7, RCW, Vol. 0, we impose upon appellant's counsel, for failure to observe the Rules on Appeal, terms of one hundred dollars to be paid to respondent's counsel as attorney's fees.
It is so ordered.
1 Reported in 348 P. (2d) 976.
55 Wn.2d 908, In the Matter of the Welfare of Johnette Goudie, A Minor
[No. 35248. Department One. February 4, 1960.]
In the Matter of the Welfare of Johnette Goudie, A Minor.1
Certiorari to review an order of the Superior Court for Skagit county, A. H. Ward, J., entered May 11, 1959, in juvenile proceedings. Affirmed.
Zundel, Merges, Brain & Isaac (Thomas J. Isaac of counsel), for relator.
Harry A. Follman and Walter J. Deierlein, Jr., for respondent.
PER CURIAM. -
This is a review by certiorari of an order of the juvenile court for Skagit county entered May 11, 1959, permanently depriving the relator father of custody of his minor daughter.
We find substantial evidence in the record to support such determination. The order entered by the juvenile court is therefore affirmed.
1 Reported in 348 P. (2d) 976.