Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Washington » Supreme Court of Washington » 1972 » 81 Wn.2d 663, THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. BEN CLAUDE PORTER, Appellant
81 Wn.2d 663, THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. BEN CLAUDE PORTER, Appellant
State: Washington
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: 42333.EnBanc
Case Date: 12/14/1972

81 Wn.2d 663, THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. BEN CLAUDE PORTER, Appellant

[No. 42333. En Banc.      Supreme Court      December 14, 1972.]

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. BEN CLAUDE
                              PORTER, Appellant.

BRACHTENBACH, J., did not participate in the disposition of this case.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 39405, William L. Brown, Jr., J., entered January 14, 1971. Affirmed in part; remanded.

Prosecution for assault. Defendant appeals from a conviction and sentence.

Cox & Majeres and John J. Majeres, for appellant (appointed counsel for appeal).

Ronald L. Hendry, Prosecuting Attorney, Joseph D. Mladinov, Special Counsel, and Eugene G. Olson, Chief Criminal Deputy, for respondent.

UTTER, J. -

The appellant, Ben Claude Porter, was charged with assault in the second degree. It was alleged in the information that he "did willfully assault Michael Ross Cox with a weapon, instrument or thing likely to produce bodily harm, to wit: a rifle." Porter was found guilty of the offense.

At the time of sentencing, the court indicated it believed itself to be bound to impose a 5-year minimum sentence under the provisions of RCW 9.41.025. This was the first indication in the record to the appellant that the provisions of this statute were to be applied. There was no indication of this fact in the information and no request for a special verdict. Our holding in State v. Frazier, 81 Wn.2d 628, 503 P.2d 1073 (1972), is controlling.

 664    LEWIS v. DEP'T OF MOTOR VEHICLES     [Dec. 1972 
                81 Wn.2d 664, 504 P.2d 298

The conviction is affirmed and the case is remanded for resentencing. The trial court will not be bound by the provisions of RCW 9.41.025 for the reasons stated in State v. Frazier, supra.

HAMILTON, C.J., FINLEY, ROSELLINI, HUNTER, HALE, STAF-FORD, and WRIGHT, JJ., concur.

Washington Law

Washington State Laws
Washington Court
    > Washington State Courts
Washington Labor Laws
    > Washington State Jobs
Washington State
    > Washington County Jail
Washington Tax
Washington Agencies
    > Washington DMV

Comments

Tips