Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Washington » Court of Appeals Division II » 2012 » Barbara Thompson, Respondent/cross-appellant V. Terry L. Wilson, Appellant/cross-respondent
Barbara Thompson, Respondent/cross-appellant V. Terry L. Wilson, Appellant/cross-respondent
State: Washington
Court: Court of Appeals Division II
Docket No: 40283-1
Case Date: 02/28/2012
 
DO NOT CITE. SEE GR 14.1(a).


Court of Appeals Division II
State of Washington

Opinion Information Sheet

Docket Number: 40283-1
Title of Case: Barbara Thompson, Respondent/cross-appellant V. Terry L. Wilson, Appellant/cross-respondent
File Date: 02/28/2012

SOURCE OF APPEAL
----------------
Appeal from Lewis County Superior Court
Docket No: 06-2-01044-1
Judgment or order under review
Date filed: 01/29/2010
Judge signing: Honorable Richard David Hicks

JUDGES
------
Authored byJill M Johanson
Concurring:David H. Armstrong
Joel Penoyar

COUNSEL OF RECORD
-----------------

Counsel for Appellant/Cross-Respondent
 John Edward Justice  
 Law Lyman Daniel Kamerrer et al
 Po Box 11880
 Olympia, WA, 98508-1880

Counsel for Respondent/Cross-Appellant
 Royce A. FergusonJr.  
 Attorney at Law
 2931 Rockefeller Ave
 Everett, WA, 98201-4019

Counsel for Other Parties
 J David Fine  
 Lewis County Prosecuting Attorney
 345 W Main St Fl 2
 Chehalis, WA, 98532-4802
			

    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

                                       DIVISION  II

BARBARA THOMPSON,                                                No.  40283-1-II

                             Respondent/
                          Cross-Appellant.

       v.

TERRY L. WILSON, Lewis County Coroner,                     UNPUBLISHED OPINION

                                Appellant/
                        Cross-Respondent.

       Johanson, J.  --  Terry L. Wilson, the former Lewis County Coroner, appealed an inquest 

jury's verdict finding  arbitrary, capricious, and inaccurate his determination that Ronda 

Reynolds's death was a suicide.  Barbara  Thompson, Reynolds's mother,          cross appealed.  

Thompson argued that the trial court abused its discretion in numerous ways.  During the appeal 

process, however, Lewis County elected a new coroner who held a second inquest.  

Consequently, Wilson moved to dismiss his appeal and Thompson's cross appeal.  We agreed that 

most of the issues on appeal were now moot.  We dismissed the appeal and cross appeal, leaving 

only Thompson's request for attorney fees to be resolved.  We hold that because Thompson failed  

No.  40283-1-II

to preserve this issue, she is not entitled to attorney fees.

                                            FACTS

       On December 16, 1998, Ronda Reynolds died from a single gunshot wound to the head.  

After an investigation, on August 9, 1999, Lewis County Coroner, Terry L. Wilson, listed the 

cause of death as a self-inflicted gunshot wound and the manner of death as suicide.  Barbara 

Thompson believed that her daughter was murdered and requested the Lewis County Sheriff's 

Office to reinvestigate.  On May 30, 2002, the sheriff's investigation confirmed that Reynolds died 

of a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

       On August 4, 2006, Thompson filed a petition for judicial review under RCW 68.50.015.  

She also sought a writ of certiorari and a writ of mandamus under chapter 7.16 RCW.           In 

response to Thompson's petition, Wilson asserted, among other things, that Thompson had failed 

to state a claim on which relief could be granted and that the statute of limitations barred her suit.  

The trial court granted Wilson's motion to dismiss all of Thompson's claims based on the statute 

of limitations. Thompson appealed.  We reversed and remanded.1

       On remand, Wilson met with Thompson as required by RCW 68.50.105.  Thompson 

provided Wilson with materials she compiled during her independent investigation that concluded 

Reynolds's death was not a suicide.  Wilson declined to amend Reynolds's death certificate.  In 

response, Thompson petitioned the trial court for judicial review under RCW 68.50.015.  The trial 

court ruled that Thompson was entitled to a jury trial.  

1 We take the above facts from our earlier published opinion.  Thompson v. Wilson, 142 Wn. App. 
803, 175 P.3d 1149 (2008). 

                                               2 

No.  40283-1-II

       At trial, Thompson presented several experts and officers who testified that Reynolds's 

death was probably not a suicide.  Wilson did not present any evidence.  The jury found that (1)

Wilson inaccurately determined Reynolds's death was a suicide and (2) Wilson's determination of 

suicide was arbitrary and capricious.

       Wilson appealed and Thompson cross appealed.  During the appeal process, Lewis County 

voters elected a new coroner, Warren McLeod.  McLeod provisionally changed the manner of 

Reynolds's death on the death certificate to "undetermined" and scheduled a second inquest.  See 

Spindle.  The second inquest determined that Reynolds's death was a homicide.  Wilson then 

moved to dismiss his appeal and Thompson's cross appeal.  Agreeing that most of the issues were 

moot, we dismissed the appeal and cross appeal, leaving only Thompson's request for attorney 

fees to be resolved.

                                      ATTORNEY FEES

       Thompson sought reasonable attorney fees under chapters 4.84 and 7.16 RCW in her 

petition for judicial review filed with Lewis County Superior Court.  The trial court, however, 

questioned whether Thompson qualified for attorney fees.  The court stated:

       Whether she qualifies for attorney's fees I would need further briefing on, because 
       in one sense a county office can be said to be an agent of the state, but there's also 
       case law involving the statute that you cite [chapter 4.84 RCW] where another 
       county was not found to be an agent for the attorney's fee statute, so I would need 
       further briefing as to whether or not you should be awarded attorney's fees.

Verbatim Report of Proceedings (Jan. 8, 2010) at 7-8.  When the parties next appeared in court, 

neither party discussed attorney fees.

       Thompson has a duty to provide a complete record as well as to provide citations to the 

                                               3 

No.  40283-1-II

record supporting her claims.  RAP 9.2(b), RAP 10.3(a)(6); see State v. Rienks, 46 Wn. App. 

537, 544-45, 731 P.2d 1116 (1987), remanded, 110 Wn.2d 1021 (1988).       Argument and citation 

to authority are required on appeal to advise the appellate court of the appropriate grounds for an 

award of attorney fees as costs.  In re Marriage of Coy, 160 Wn. App. 797, 808, 248 P.3d 1101 

(2011). In addition to failing to provide adequate citation to authority and argument, Thompson 

has failed to provide a complete record for review.  The trial court made no ruling at all on 

Thompson's request for attorney fees.  Therefore, there is no trial court decision to review.

       Because Thompson does not prevail on appeal, she is not entitled to attorney fees and 

costs on appeal.

       A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the 

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, it 

is so ordered.

                                                                   Johanson, J.
We concur:

                Armstrong, J.

                  Penoyar, C.J.

                                               4
			

 

Washington Law

Washington State Laws
Washington Court
    > Washington State Courts
Washington Labor Laws
    > Washington State Jobs
Washington State
    > Washington County Jail
Washington Tax
Washington Agencies
    > Washington DMV

Comments

Tips